Businesses in the Inland Empire already have a hard enough time making ends meet. The responsibilities of meeting payroll, coming within budget and maintaining a positive cash flow are harder to meet than they were just a few years ago.
An added pressure to businesses can be the cost of responding to a subpoena requiring the production of documents. While many assume that only parties can be subpoenaed, a third party, also known as a non-party, can be subject to this power as well.
Being unwittingly included in litigation via subpoena can be a hassle, but current laws ensure fair compensation for the time and resources you expend on meeting its requirements.
In California, businesses are able to charge the party issuing the subpoena for all reasonable costs associated with producing records in a civil case, including postage, clerical charges and reproduction of documents. Payment for these costs can be received when you deliver the subpoenaed records, and you have no obligation to deliver the records until the party in the litigation case makes the payment.
However, you must produce an itemized statement in order to be compensated. Moreover, if a party to the litigation merely inspects or makes copies of documents at your place of business, recoverable fees cannot exceed $15.
Subpoenas requiring the production of records from non-parties aren’t just limited to litigation in California state court. Attorneys can also issue such subpoenas to non-parties in a case filed in federal court.
Federal rules require that such subpoenas not be unreasonable or oppressive, and if they are, the issuing party can be mandated to produce reasonable payment beforehand. In fact, federal rules instruct courts to protect non-parties from significant expense.
Thus, if a business is facing significant expense to produce documents, it is within their legal right to seek reimbursement.
The Riverside attorneys at Reid & Hellyer often represent Inland Empire businesses in business litigation, and regularly counsel clients who receive a subpoena as a third party to the litigation. Often times, the attorneys are able to work with the subpoenaing party to reduce the burden on your business. Serving your customers and clients should be your utmost priority, and as one of the largest firms in Riverside and San Bernardino counties, Reid & Hellyer exists to ensure that the burden of our legal system does not impair your business activity without due compensation under law.
 Cal. Evid. Code § 1563(b).
 Cal. Evid. Code § 1563(b)(1).
 Cal. Evid. Code § 1563(b)(2).
 Cal. Evid. Code § 1563(b)(3).
 Cal. Evid. Code § 1563(b)(6).
 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 45.
 Shepherd v. Castle, 20 F.R.D. 184 (D.C. Mo. 1957).
 Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(c)(2)(B) Advisory Committee’s Note (“a non-party required to produce documents or materials is protected against significant expense resulting from involuntary assistance to the court.”).
**This client advisory is intended to provide the reader with general information regarding current legal issues. It is not to be construed as specific legal advice nor as a substitute for the need to seek advice from an attorney on specific legal matters.**
Incoming search terms:
- recuperation of costs for subpoenas
- yasi suit charging for responding to supboena
- recovering expense of responding to FBI subpoena for documents
- recover cost to respond to subpoena
- reasonable cost of third party legal
- reasonable amount for copying doucments for subpoena california
- pennsylvania reimburse subpoena costs
- pennsylvania recover costs for complying with subpoena
- paying production costs of nonparty in response to subpoena
- pay fees of document production subpoena oregon